This is my second review of the cord that connects my PS2 to the TV. The first one was way more critical of the quality of the cable connection, but the second one is a lot less so. I would not consider myself to be a cord cutter, but I can see the value of the cord.
I don’t know how many PS2 owners would be willing to tell you that they use their PS2 as their TV, but I am one of them. I can see the benefit of being able to watch TV with your PS2. I love the idea of it because I can stream TV shows and movies from my PS2. I can’t do this with my Xbox360 because the Xbox’s built-in video is not capable of playing 720p content.
But I think there is a price to be paid for being able to watch TV on a console, and that price is cord. I have been using my Xbox360 for years to watch TV, because it does not have that built-in video. My Xbox360 is also hooked up to my home theater PC, so I can play games on my TV.
It is possible to use a PS2 for watching TV, but I have to say that I’ve found it to be a bit of a pain to use compared to my Xbox360. But I’m glad I have a PS2 for watching TV because I can easily hook it up to my home theater PC so I can watch my TV on my PC.
I feel the same way about my Xbox360. I also have a home theater PC that I hook up to my PS2, so I can watch my TV on my PC. I guess if you want to watch your Xbox360 on your TV, you have to buy a PS2, right? I’m not sure if I’m that interested in the idea of being able to watch TV on a console, but I’m glad I have a PS2.
PS2 has a ton of other games that I don’t need to get into here, but let’s start with some of the console’s strengths. First and foremost, it can run PS3 games, unlike the Xbox360, which can only run Xbox 360 games.
The Xbox360 is also the only console that can run the PS3. The 360 also has a much larger library of games than the PS3. The 360 has a huge library of games that you can play on your TV (and for the PS3, you can play games on it!). Also, the 360 is cheaper, being the system that was designed to play most of your PS3 games.
Yes, the 360 has a larger library of games than the PS3, but there are several other consoles that are cheaper, have a larger library, and can run PS3 games. The Wii is the cheapest console with a library of games that is significantly larger than the 360’s, but it doesn’t have a TV, so it requires a PlayStation game to play some PS3 games.
The PS3 is the cheapest console to have a television, and it also has the most games on it. But as you can see from the above chart, the PS3 is cheaper to have a library of games than any other console. It is the one console that is the cheapest to have a TV, but it doesnt have a big library of games.
I don’t think having a TV is really important to anyone. After all, we have a bunch of TVs with high-quality TVs, and we wouldn’t need them if we had our own. The real deciding factor, however, is whether or not we can play some games on them.